It is difficult to engage in a conversation or civic
discussion with a person who holds rigid views or extreme prejudice. How can we
engage such a person and encourage him/her to reflect, even if this does not lead
to a change in the long-held view?
One method may be to request the person to explicitly
express the value about which he/she feels strongly. Then, invite the person to
examine this value in the specific context in which it is under discussion. What
if the context is different or changed?
What was the origin of this view historically? What was the
context in which it came into use? Is that context still valid in the current
age and place? Is that context applicable to the specific incident to which it
is applied?
Ask the person about the consequences of applying his/her view in
the current context (place, people and time) on the affected individuals? What will be his/her position if he/she were at the
receiving end of the same view held by someone else? Can he/she consider
conditions under which he/she will be open to alternate views?
What if the person with the rigid view is myself? The first step is recognition and acknowledgment that I may be wrong. That requires humility, open mind and reflection.
What if the person with the rigid view is myself? The first step is recognition and acknowledgment that I may be wrong. That requires humility, open mind and reflection.
No comments:
Post a Comment